padres

Quick Trip up to Anaheim

Posted on by Paul

With Anaheim actually the closest ballpark to San Diego and the Padres playing the Angels on the weekend, decided to go up there yesterday to catch a game. I’ve been to Angel Stadium a handful of times over the years after they introduced interleague play, with my first time in 2001 during Tony Gwynn’s last season.

I remember back in 2001 the Angels doing a short ceremony before the game for Tony Gwynn being it was his last season (I went to the first game of the series) and liked the renovations the Angels did back then after the Rams left. I walked around the ballpark then and what stood out was that the views were good whether you were in the upper level or in the outfield beyond the bullpens in left field as it still didn’t feel far away like some other ballparks.

A few notes on Anaheim Stadium in 2026:

  • It’s pretty easy and quick to exit off the freeway (we exited about 12:30pm for the 1:07pm start) but it does back up when you’re at the road right in front of the ballpark. In this case, we entered at the State College entrance coming from the State College Blvd exit off the 5 freeway and it was backed up from the Orangewood Ave and S State College Blvd intersection. That part took us about 15 minutes to go one block since there’s only one right turn lane from this direction into the parking entrance.
  • The large parking lot around the stadium is great for tailgating and reminds me of the old Qualcomm Stadium days. They are starting to build more apartments (with businesses at the bottom) around the area but there still really aren’t a lot of places to go within walking distance, like how Disneyland and the Anaheim Convention Center have many restaurants around them on the other side of the freeway.
  • As a result, the skyline of the ballpark is pretty blank as shown in the pictures below since there really isn’t much around it.
  • Seats continue to have a good view as shown in the pictures below. First base (visitor’s dugout) side is the sun side for day games (like Petco Park) so definitely get in the 200s if you want to be behind the visiting team and in the shade. Being this was mid-April, we sat in row Z of section 124, which was the last row of the section and we were in the shade the whole game. So early games you have shade if you’re in the last 2-3 rows of the 100s as shown in my pictures below.
  • The video boards they upgraded in 2018 still hold up well and provide good views for replays. They don’t show advanced metrics like you see at other ballparks for pitching and batting as all you saw was the speed of the pitch and what type of pitch (“92 MPH Changeup”).
  • One thing I found interesting is the Angels’ bullpen is the one closest to the stands with the visitors in front next to the outfield. I figured they would be like other teams where the visitors are the closer one to the fans so that the fans can bother/heckle the visiting team’s bullpen pitchers more than the Angels.

I don’t put Angel Stadium high in my list of rankings but for just watching a game like I did yesterday (didn’t really walk around or anything being we got there right before game time and I’ve been here before), Angels Stadium provides good views and the prices are comparable if not slightly cheaper than Petco for a weekend game. So if you just want to watch a game, Angel Stadium is still good for this but as I put in my reviews of other ballparks, all the other amenities, design, surroundings, etc is what make the top ballparks what they are.

Road Trip to Boston and Fenway Park

Posted on by Paul

With the 2026 started, it’s time to resume my chase to see all 30 ballparks and no better way to start this season than Fenway Park, which along with Wrigley Field, are considered the two must see classic ballparks.

Starting from a hotel in the Back Bay area of Boston about a mile away, it was an easy walk over to the ballpark and the ballpark’s location is easy to get to in general, with a couple of subway stations nearby.

We entered the ballpark at Jersey Street (formerly Yawkey Way) where they do security and ticket scanning versus at the gate of the ballpark itself. I like this as it allowed the blocked off street to be a place where they had food, music, the team store and other entertainment to hang out before entering the ballpark.

A nice touch on Jersey Street is the starting lineup using retro-style Topps baseball cards:

As well, on the backside of the Green Monster (Lansdowne St) is the Bleacher Bar (that allows you a peek of center field) and other bars and food that are open to anyone without a ticket:

Once you enter the ballpark, depending on which entrance you go into (we entered from Jersey Street which covers Gate A and Gate D), you may end up in the tunnels underneath the grandstands which can get pretty crowded and hard to navigate with large crowds and how small these tunnels are, which is expected considering the design when these ballparks were built over a hundred years ago. Other entrances enter more opened areas but entering under the grandstands, it is pretty tight to walk around.

But I do like that you can still walk around and see the field like newer ballparks in certain parks, like there’s a walkway behind the grandstand level, even if the walkway is small in some areas:

And they do have standing room only around most of the ballpark and on every level (except the box level where you can enter from the aforementioned tunnel underneath the grandstand), even if they uniquely do it like in right field where you’re standing elevated behind the narrow walkway:

I’m a big fan of places that have standing room only so you can go around to see different vantage points, even if it’s just for a few innings or as you’re walking to get food and drink.

Of course the grandstand is where you have the beams blocking your view and depending on how you view it, they still have the old school chairs:

Some might find this quaint and keeping with the old school look while others might not like this at all because the seats are uncomfortable plus your limited sightlines with beams blocking some of your view. We sat in the loge box in front of the grandstands so they had more standard seats and no beams so didn’t have this issue but I can see those who sit back knocking Fenway down a notch because of this.

Walking around the ballpark, they have group/bar areas as well as a kids area, things to allow for socializing as well as activities for the kids. I do like how they’re doing these things to keep people entertained and make baseball attractive to those who want it to be a social event too.

I get how baseball purists may not like this since the focus should be on the game but to really get the crowds to keep coming out and make the ballpark a place to be, you do need all these things to keep the casual fans coming. Because to me, having a ballpark that people want to go and with full crowds gives it so much energy that is substantially better than a small 10-15K crowd of hardcore fans.

As far as food options, the ballpark has food that’s locally inspired, like lobster rolls and clam chowder, along with what you see as standard ballpark fares, with hot dogs, burgers, chicken tenders and fries. Jersey Street has more options but it doesn’t have the variety and/or featuring local eateries as you see in other ballparks. There are a good number of restaraunts outside the ballpark so that’s the better option to grab something to eat before getting to the ballpark.

I found the ballpark to have pretty good views in the different areas we visited. It does seem to have obstructed views no matter where you sit, similar to how new ballparks are designed in that you may not see a small portion of the field, like sitting in Loge Box 137 you couldn’t see the left field corner right where the foul line meets the warning track. But I considered that part of how ballparks are now in order to get away from the cookie-cutter circle/oval design.

While watching the game, I did notice that the netting right behind home plate goes over the seating and right up to the second level so any foul balls hit right behind home plate would roll back down to the field where the ballboy would be waiting to grab them. Found that interesting to add that extra layer of protection (which I actually don’t mind with how hard hit some of these foul balls are and taking some off my hands in the past that flew right over the netting). This netting over the seats is strictly only in the few sections right behind home plate as the rest of the netting down the foul line is the standard netting that goes straight up in front of the stands.

The other nice touch is how the LED boards behind home plate that show the box score, balls/strikes/outs and the batter are colored in green to match the rest of the awning (the ones not showing ads that is), which I found to be a nice touch to blend into the rest of the ballpark.

As well, you can’t help but enjoy the old school scoreboard on the Green Monster and manually updating it:

In keeping with the old school theme, they don’t show advanced pitching metrics (horizontal break, vertical break) but interestingly they do show advanced batting metrics (distance, launch angle and bat speed) on the replay of the ball the batter gets a hit on or an out.

And in between innings, they generally just play music (though it does include contemporary music and not just organ music), with minimal entertainment like you see at the newer ballparks that play skits, contests and games with fans/players, have the in-game announcer trying to hype you up to make noise, etc. It goes with the old school vibes that the ballpark tries to still maintain while doing updates to work in the new age.

Overall I really liked Fenway Park and can see why it’s a baseball cathedral you must visit. The tickets are quite expensive when compared to other ballparks for similar seats but it definitely is in my top tier of ballparks and one that I would recommend anyone check out a game at least one time.

First Homestand of 2026 Musings

Posted on by Paul

Some thoughts from the first homestand:

  • It doesn’t seem Craig Stammen knows how to manage the bullpen as of yet, despite being a bullpen guy himself. In the second game of the season with a 2-1 lead and Estrada walking two straight guys, you leave him in to walk another guy, give up a slow infield hit to tie it up and then you wait until you have the lefty on lefty matchup to bring in Peralta to face Kevin McGonigle, who even though he’s a rookie in only his second game, had a four hit game in his first game and is on fire and you you don’t really have a book on him yet. I get that Mason Miller wouldn’t be available for a multi-inning save in the second game of the season (though he was available to do it today in the sixth game of the season?) but bring someone else in earlier when Estrada had lost control out there.
  • Then in the fifth game of the season, down 4-3 in the 6th inning, after Kyle Hart had giving you two great innings, you leave him in and he gives up a double and a walk to start the inning. Instead of having another reliever start the inning (asking two innings out of Hart is already a great ask) or pulling Hart at this time, you leave him in. He does strike out the next batter before giving up another two more singles to drive in another run to make it 5-3. At that point you pull him but it’s the bases loaded and you’re putting Bradgley Rodriguez in a tough spot. Of course it doesn’t work out and the game gets out of hand then and becomes 8-3 and eventually a 9-3 loss.
  • The offense continues to sputter, similar to last year. New coaching staff, new hitting coaches and still the same result. I thought with a new manager, you would see more creativity in the lineup. At least in today’s game, Stammen did tinker with the lineup a little bit, moving Manny down to cleanup and Laureano, who’s been the hottest hitter in the lineup, up to fifth. Laureano continued his hot ways, helping give some cushion with a two-run home run in the 8th to push a 3-1 lead up to 5-1 in what became a much needed 7-1 victory.
  • It was great to see Nick Pivetta bounce back today and get through five innings with no runs, one hit, eight strikeouts and only two walks after the bad opening day start of three innings and six runs. Hoping this is the start of seeing him like last year as he continues to build up (only 82 pitches today).
  • Thought the Padres would get off to a better start. The Tigers I figured would be a tough matchup with who they had for starting pitching but seeing them get swept by Arizona after playing the Padres and seeing how SF struggled against the Yankees in their opening series, I expected a little more and figured a .500 homestand. So 2-4 isn’t as bad, especially after yesterday’s poor 9-3 loss to SF. so we’ll see how the team looks after this road trip against Boston and Pittsburgh and finally getting to hit against Paul Skenes.

Opening Day 2026 Musings

Posted on by Paul

Opening Day continues to be one of my favorite days of the year as it’s great to be back at the ballpark and catch Padres baseball again after the end of the previous season, especially being at Petco Park where it’s such a great place to watch a game.

As usual, when we get to the ballpark on Opening Day, we like to walk around and see what’s new as they always seem to be doing something new at Petco.

There is a good article at the San Diego Union-Tribune about the new food, though we didn’t get a chance to try any of it today as we arrived just in time for pre-game ceremonies. I did notice the Coco Ichibanya stand that took over the location of Delaware North’s San Diego’s Finest Chicken in the Mercado and is definitely one I plan to try at a future game.

The one thing that stuck out from my seats is the new video boards on the towers. I’m glad that they’re starting to show pitching metrics consistently now, something that other ballparks have been doing for some time. Last year’s intro of the pitching metrics on the LED ribbon boards behind home plate (see below) in the middle of the season was a good start so it’s nice to see they continue showing this information.

Now with these boards, they have a more permanent place to toggle them in addition to showing the standard pitching data:

They do use these boards to show the in-game messages as shown on the other boards, like “Strikeout”, “Get Loud”, etc and of course (which was probably the main reason to have them), circle through ads before the game and in between innings. But overall being someone who likes tech, I do like having these boards and don’t think it detracts from the ballpark’s aesthetics. Now if they can update the big video board in left field as it’s starting to show its wear (some panels of it look burned from the sun) after being around for 11+ years now…

As far as the game itself, Nick Pivetta didn’t look too good and it got out of hand early as coming back from a 6-0 deficit after three innings (even a 4-0 deficit after one inning) was going to be difficult against Tarik Skubal. So that dampened the mood of the game pretty quick and raises the questions everyone’s been wondering about the starting pitching. It is just the first game so let’s see after the first turn through the rotation.

I feel pretty good about the bullpen, considering Mason Miller is the closer (and should have been the closer to end 2025) and the many arms the Padres have there, even with Jason Adam being slow-played by starting on the Injured List (IL). I know relievers are pretty volatile in general (one year they’ll be great and then the next year fall off), but at the same time it seems AJ Preller and staff are able to find bullpen replacements every year if needed. Who would have thought that guys like Steven Wilson (2022), Tom Cosgrove (2023), Jeremiah Estrada (2024) or David Morgan (2025) would be as good as they ended up being going into those respective seasons?

Even with the return of pretty much the same lineup as the end of last season (Ramon Laureano would have been in the lineup during the playoffs if he didn’t get injured at the end of the regular season), I still like this lineup along with the additions of Miguel Andujar and Sung-Mun Song when he’s healthy and ready to go.

It also makes sense to add veteran guys like Nick Castellanos and Ty France where you can buy low and start the season with them, keeping the guys with minor league options in the minors and hoping these vets bounce back like we’ve seen the past few years with Gavin Sheets, Donovan Solano, David Peralta and Jurickson Profar (though of course with Profar you have questions now considering multiple PED suspensions). If these guys work out, then great as it was a cheap flyer on them and if they don’t, you move on like has been done the past few years with Matt Carpenter, Nelson Cruz, Jason Heyward and Yuli Gurriel and then try one of the young guys that still have minor league options.

Similarly with the starting pitching and the flyers on Walker Buehler and German Marquez. Starting pitching is more worrisome considering Joe Musgrove is starting the season on the IL and you hope Michael King is back to who he was before the injury last year and there isn’t much depth there. But maybe I’m a little too optimistic, but I feel they’ll find ways to fill innings as they have the past few seasons, considering we have Ruben Niebla leading the staff and despite today’s rough start by Pivetta.

Michael King Returns

Posted on by Paul

Going into the offseason, it was unlikely that Dylan Cease and Michael King would return but if I had the choice of one, I would go with Michael King. Cease is a workhorse but seeing how inconsistent he is (not to mention how he’s done in the playoffs) along with King’s repertoire and the fact that I figured his contract would be cheaper, I was really hoping the Padres could find a way to bring him back.

But once Cease signed early in the offseason with Toronto for 7 years $210 million, you figured King would get a good deal especially as you heard about the Yankees, Red Sox and Orioles being interested, all teams on the east coast where King was from.

But then you heard murmurs about the Padres still being interested and the deal was quickly announced. He gets one year at $22 million, which is pretty much the $22.025 million qualifying offer, and then two additional years at his option to make it two years $45 million or three years $75 million.

Three years $75 million was what some were projecting he would get going into free agency and considering the qualifying offer draft pick compensation, his injuries in 2025 plus his limited history as a starter, this may have scared off some teams or lower their offer to a lower average annual value to less than $25 million.

I see this as a good deal for both sides. King benefits more since, if he pitches extremely well, he can go back into free agency for a big payday without the qualifying offer attached that scares some teams off and if he doesn’t, he can opt in and try again in a year or two.

But I see this as a win for the Padres since they need starting pitching for 2026, they know what King’s capable of and anyone else who could be of ace quality would have been at least the same cost if not more. I’ve always felt that long-term contracts for pitchers are extremely risky for the team with how injuries affect pitchers. Just look at Yu Darvish and Joe Musgrove and the injuries to them since they both signed their long-term extensions.

For the Padres with a bunch of large contracts, having King on a short-term contract is ideal so you have quality pitching without being tied to something large and long term. Of course it would have been better if it was team options or a straight three year deal but it seems being creative to reduce the actual cost (since the contract is structured with $12 million as a signing bonus, a $5 million salary in 2026 and a $5 million buyout if he declines the option) is something AJ is having to do to keep the Padres costs down. So this seems to be the only way to get him to accept is giving him options. Then again, it may be what the Padres prefer since they may hope guys opt out so we don’t have too many more long-term contracts on the books.

I’m bullish on King being closer to his 2024 self versus what we saw in 2025. Considering in 2025 before his first injury sleeping awkwardly, he was pitching great (10 starts with a 2.59 ERA, .195 AVG against, 1.02 WHIP, 3.26 FIP) and he says he’s fully healthy so I can see him having a great season in 2026 and being at the front of the rotation.

Craig Stammen new Padres Manager

Posted on by Paul

When it was posted yesterday morning on X.com by Matt Jones out of Kentucky that Craig Stammen was the new manager:

My first reaction was this couldn’t be serious considering we hadn’t heard anything about him being a candidate and Stammen not having any managerial/coaching experience. There had been talk of a fourth mysterious candidate outside of Albert Pujols, Ruben Niebla and Nick Hundley so at that point it didn’t seem that far-fetched if he was the person.

Then the Padres announced it an hour later:

Once the shock wore off and I started reading more coverage of it, I could see why he was the choice. All four candidates that were finalists didn’t have MLB managerial experience (granted Pujols had experience managing in the Dominican Republic league) so any candidate was going to need to learn on the job and have a good experienced staff around him.

And with how highly people speak of Stammen as a leader and people person and how he’s worked in the Padres organization since 2023, I could see AJ wanting someone who knew how the organization worked, its philosophy and how the players are (especially guys like Machado and Tatis who he’s played alongside) to maintain that continuity like they did with Mike Shildt.

Of course, the other side is maybe it’s time to do something different to break up that continuity because depending on how you look at it, it’s either a good or bad thing how the Padres have been lately. Good that since 2020 the Padres have had more success than any other time in franchise history (four playoff trips in six years) but bad in that it still hasn’t resulted in winning the World Series.

I don’t have as much of an uproar about it as other people since it wasn’t like we were realistically choosing him over Bruce Bochy (which would have been great as previously mentioned) so anyone was going to be new in this role. And superstars like Pujols generally haven’t translated well into managerial/front office roles since it’s hard for them to relate and understand the mindset of all players on the roster, since they can’t understand the difficulties that journeyman players have.

So that’s generally why you see a lot of managers being players who were role/bench guys become managers and head coaches. While pitchers haven’t really been managers before and he has no experience, that to me is the unconventional part of this hire, which I don’t mind as much to try something different. So I see it as combination of both something to be stable and unconventional which is on brand for AJ Preller.

There’s been plenty of guys with limited or no experience coaching and managing like Steve Kerr and JJ Redick in the NBA and Aaron Boone and Mike Matheny in MLB. Of course, there have been plenty of other spectacular failures with new guys, just look at Andy Green and Jayce Tingler that AJ hired. So it’s a crapshoot regardless of which way it goes but I’m open to seeing how it plays out with Craig Stammen before bashing the move already like others are doing.

Mike Shildt’s Retirement

Posted on by Paul

I was surprised as anyone by Mike Shildt’s retirement. I wasn’t a big fan of his stubbornness and how he constructed the lineup (Arraez batting 2nd all season) and his use of the bullpen (sticking with Suarez as the closer after acquiring Mason Miller and the way he used Wandy Peralta in high leverage situations) but considering the Padres won 90+ games in back to back seasons for the first time and made the playoffs in back to back years, it was expected for him to be back another year.

But once he retired and word came out about some of the coaching staff and support staff issues, you can see why he would be burnt out trying to do a tough job and working with everyone in the org. Being a sports manager/coach at the professional or college level isn’t an easy job with all the committments you have with players, coaches, the org and media. Maybe it was better for everyone if he left at this time.

What’s interesting is reading about how Ryan Flaherty was AJ Preller’s preferred choice for manager two years ago but he may have been overruled by Eric Kutsenda and Erik Greupner. When the decision was announced then that Mike Shildt would be the new manager, I liked the decision as you were going with someone who had been inside the team for the past two years to understand the team dynamics and organizational structure and was an experienced winning manager. You figured he would keep going what had been built, better handle some of the issues (like the strife between AJ Preller and Bob Melvin) and could keep it running for several years.

And Shildt did exactly that with how they won in 2024 but 2025 you started to see maybe why he left St. Louis because of “philosophical differences”. It was with the way he managed the team as there’s no way the analytics team wasn’t telling him that Arraez shouldn’t be batting second with how much he struggled throughout the season not should he have continued playing first base over Ryan O’Hearn who is a much better defender by the metrics at 1B.

As the search turns to the new manager, my ideal scenario would be to bring back Bruce Bochy for two years and promise Ruben Niebla to be the next manager. Bochy being 70 isn’t going to manage much longer (if he does manage again) so why not bring him home to take it over the finish line like what he did with the Texas Rangers.

He knows how to win and push the right buttons in the playoffs and someone like him would be respected in the clubhouse to make the tough decisions. It feels like part of the reason Mike Shildt didn’t want to make changes was the relationships he built with players that he didn’t want to upset even though it was in the best interests of the club and that’s where I can see Bochy doing this and getting the players onboard. And it would be great to have Boch finish out his managerial career with his first team and get us the elusive first World Series title.

But realistically it doesn’t seem this will happen from what I’ve read (doesn’t seem the Padres want to bring him back and not sure Bochy wants to come back into this) so will be interesting to see who the next manager is.

End of the Playoffs Musings

Posted on by Paul

With the Padres being eliminated by the Cubs in the Wild Card Series 2 games to 1, some musings with the season now over:

  • The Padres played this playoff series pretty much like they have in the regular season with the offense not able to score too many runs and the pitching doing pretty well. I would have taken giving up only 6 runs in a three-game series against a team at their ballpark that slugs (Cubs were third in the NL in home runs during the regular season) going into the series. The Padres only scoring 5 runs total isn’t that surprising considering how the offense has played. They did score 3 of the 5 runs on home runs (60% of their runs) which is substantially higher than what they did in the regular season (about 33% of their runs were on home runs).
  • The top of the order with Tatis (1-12 with 2 runs and 1 walk), Arraez (2-11) and Machado (1-10 with 1 HR, 2 RBI, 1 run and 2 walks) really hampered the offense. Manny did have the big home run in the game 2 win in which Tatis scored two of the three runs, which actually shows that the Padres are dependent on the top of the lineup. This put a damper on how well Fermin, Merill and Bogaerts were able to hit in the series, with all three getting on base all three games.
  • You have to wonder if this team ever gets over the hump. 4 postseason trips in 6 years is the best period in Padres baseball. One way to look at it, is if you keep giving yourself chances to be in the playoffs, that eventually the team breaks through. You can look at how many times the Dodgers have made the playoffs and how many times they’ve won the World Series, with the same for the Astros and the Braves, with the Braves both recently and when they were making the playoffs in the 90s. The other way to look at it is this team’s already at the ceiling and won’t get over the hump so it’s time to break it up a bit and try something different.
  • I do wonder if Manny is the person to really lead this team to the promise land considering his current postseason stats of .209/.259/.423 in 51 postseason games. Not saying he isn’t a part of a championship team but more being the leader of the team as he currently is with the Padres. The team seems to go as he goes and he’s not consistent enough. He’s right when he says he ends up with his baseball card numbers each year but it’s usually because he has hot stretches along with cold stretches. This season is a great example of this where he struggled in April, carried the team in May through July and then ended the season ice cold in August and September. In the playoffs, we need someone who can consistently deliver throughout the month and thus far in Manny’s career he hasn’t done this in multiple playoff runs, including his time before the Padres.
  • The Padres can’t really completely revamp or rebuild their team (and they really shouldn’t) so here are my first thoughts on the 2026 lineup:
    C – Fermin and another catcher
    1B – ?
    2B – Cronenworth
    SS – Bogaerts
    3B – Machado
    LF – Laureano
    CF – Merrill
    RF – Tatis
    DH – Sheets and a righty
    Utility IF – Veteran
    Utility OF – Johnson
    O’Hearn could be an option at 1B depending on what his market is, though I feel he may get offers more than what the Padres are looking to pay for a 1B. I wouldn’t be opposed to Diaz coming back to be the catcher behind Fermin and I don’t believe Salas is ready considering his injury-plagued 2025 and with how long it takes catchers to develop. Having a righty to complement Sheets would be a good mix since Sheets can also complement Laureano in LF as needed.

    SP – Pivetta
    SP – Musgrove
    SP – Vasquez
    SP – Sears
    SP – ?
    Will need at least two considering how injuries happen in a season, so Waldron could be an option here (and I believe he will still have a minor league option in 2026) in addition to a free agent signing if not multiple signings. Hard to see King or Cease coming back with how the pitching market usually is but will be interesting to see what King’s market looks like after the injury.

    RP – Miller
    RP – Morejon
    RP – Adam (may come back after the season starts)
    RP – Estrada
    RP – Matsui (Padres can’t send him down)
    RP – Morgan
    RP – Rodriguez
    RP – Hoeing
    RP – Reynolds
    RP – Marinaccio
    I listed a large amount of relievers as the Padres have pretty good relievers and like the starters, will need additional relievers throughout the course of a season due to injuries or as other things come up. Some of these guys like Rodriguez and Marinaccio will still have minor league options to send up and time as needed to juggle the roster throughout the season.
  • With that said, all we can do is look forward to 2026 and hope that sometime soon the team can win that elusive first World Series. As it has been in this decide, I expect it will be another interesting offseason with the Padres. I’ll see everyone at Opening Day on March 26, 2026.

End of the Regular Season Musings

Posted on by Paul

With the regular season now over, some musings before the playoffs start tomorrow:

  • Finishing with 90 wins so that it was the first time in franchise history to have back-to-back 90+ win seasons and make the playoffs back-to-back for the second time in franchise history is pretty good. I wasn’t expecting the team to win 90 games at the beginning of the season but with the trades made, you expected them to be good (60-49 at the trade deadline so 30-23 after) so finishing with 90 wins feels about right. They ended at a season 18 games above .500 (which they also achieved earlier in the season when they were 74-56).
  • Still disappointing that they had the poor stretch in late August and early September (losing 11 out of 16 games). Even playing a little better at .500 (8-8) would have given them a legitimate shot to win the division or at least finish as the 4 seed to host the wild card round at Petco.
  • The lost of Ramon Laureano and Jason Adam are both big and it’s unfortunate that they happened to freak injuries. Considering how many left handed batters the team has, Laureano provided a good right handed complement. With Adam, you could be less dependent on your starters (and outside of Nick Pivetta, they’re all pretty inconsistent and shaky) as well as have multiple high leverage relievers available every day to keep guys fresh. I get it with the playoffs there are more off days but still it was the reason they got Mason Miller to build the super bullpen.
  • I see the Wild Card series as being pretty even with the Chicago Cubs and going either way. Cubs losing Cade Horton is a big blow and Kyle Tucker is just back from injury. Cubs have the better starting pitching still and more slug while the Padres have the better bullpen and you hope the hitters can hit like they’ve been doing the past week, albeit this was hitting at home where the Padres are much better (52-29 at home versus 38-43 on the road).
  • Looking forward to the playoffs and hopefully the Padres can make a long run. It is true that anything can happen in the playoffs as there’s so much randomness there and role players can get on a run like Trent Grisham did for the Padres in 2022.

Road Trip to New York and Citi Field

Posted on by Paul

With the current Southwest Companion Pass promotional period in effect, we decided to make a quick trip to New York to see the Padres play the Mets and revisit Citi Field since I personally hadn’t been there in 14 years.

Back when I went back in 2011, I remember liking the design of the ballpark and overall the ballpark experience so was looking forward to seeing it again.

First thing is the ballpark is pretty easy to get to on the subway as the 7 train has a stop (Mets-Willets Point station) that literally is in front of Citi Field’s main entrance. This station is also where you would get off if you were going to the tennis US Open.

The US Open grounds are on one side, Citi Field is on the other side and construction is currently underway to build Etihad Park, the new home of New York FC of MLS, across the street from Citi Field. So this area is becoming a sports complex area, which kind of reminds me of Philadelphia where they have their two stadiums and arena in an area a little outside of Downtown with the downtown Philadelphia skyline off in the background.

In this case, you have the Manhattan skyline in the background but you do have Flushing Chinatown which is a 20-minute walk (or one subway stop away) from the ballpark and where we stayed at.

From our hotel in Flushing Chinatown, you can see Citi Field and Etihad Park being built (in the bottom left corner of the picture) and the Manhattan skyline in the background:

Arriving at the main entrance from the subway station, you’re greeted with the main entrance with the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, which was inspired by Ebbets Field. The building itself has a good mix of bricks and green coloring which makes it have a nice natural look and makes it belong in the area.

Once you enter the Rotunda, you have to go up stairs/escalator to get to the field level and other levels of the ballpark. The one thing of note is once you get to the field level you can walk around the entire ballpark without having to go up/down stairs again like some ballparks (i.e. Petco Park).

Walking around the field level, it does feel tight with the large crowds the Mets are drawing and considering that it’s enclosed on top by the upper level.

They do have a good amount of standing room only around the ballpark, though there are suites behind home plate so as you walk behind home plate, your view of the field is blocked and you instead see team store stands. For places where you have standing room, they don’t have rails to hold your food but they do have cup holders:

And as you walk in the outfield, the Shea Bridge as an ode to Shea Stadium is a nice touch.

As you continue on Shea Bridge (going from right field to center field), you see their humongous video screen that stands out anywhere you go in the ballpark.

The video screen is a plus for me as I’m big on having these technology advances at a ballpark and super big video screens are a part of it. It proved pretty useful in the two games we went to, as everyone in the ballpark could clearly see that two balls hit down the left field line by Juan Soto and Fernando Tatis Jr were both foul.

What I thought was also pretty cool was behind the big video board is a social and kids area and even on the backside of the big video screen is a pretty big video screen for you to watch the game and stay up on the action as your kids are playing and/or you’re hanging out and socializing with family and friends.

Overall the ballpark has good sightlines from anywhere you sit. The upper deck can feel high and a little away from the game, especially when you’re in the upper level seats in left field.

Because of the seats in left field, the big video screen in center, there really isn’t much of a skyline for the ballpark beyond the outfield like you see with other ballparks. Right behind the ballpark in the outfield is an expressway and the Flushing Bay and then you have LaGuardia Airport to the northwest so planes are flying in the background, which probably limited what they could do here. So if you wanted to pick something that could be better compared to other ballparks, that would be one thing to nitpick at.

Foodwise, the Mets have a mixture of local NY institutions that include the big name food vendors like Shake Shack and Nathan’s Hot Dogs as well as other known NY places like Prince Street Pizza, Pat LaFrieda and Fuku. They also have food such as the Pastrami on Rye, Zeppole, lobster rolls, Goya nachos that are developed in house and pretty good in quality. Overall, they have a good selection of food with many different options that everyone should be able to find something good to eat.

Watching the game, it’s interesting that like Petco, they have a large screen (even bigger) but what’s normally on the screen when a batter is up is pretty static, maybe so as to not distract the hitters. Because they show the advanced pitching and hitting metrics (pitch horizontal break, pitch vertical break, etc) on the ribbon boards but temporarily i.e. they flash it after the pitch and then change it back to the regular information they show.

I find it interesting that ballparks like Citi Field and Petco Park don’t keep it on all the time like other ballparks (Rogers Centre comes to mind) since they have so many different LED boards they can show it on or display it on the main board itself. But obviously, the answer is they want to display ads instead.

The in-game entertainment is good, they do things to hype up the crowd like the “Make Noise” display and I like how they dim the lights during the game to get the crowd going, not strictly saving this for the closer’s entrance. In between innings, they usually do something like the cap shuffle, mascot race, different cams, karaoke, etc. to keep the fans engaged.

Overall, the Mets know that not all fans coming to games are going to be hardcore fans that watch every pitch intently. They make the game and the ballpark itself an attraction so it’s a fun place to watch a game and have a night out. I would definitely recommend checking out Citi Field as it is a nice ballpark to go to and watch a game at.